Sox Iso 27001 Mapping Diagram

1, ENISA Control Mapping. 2, Control areas and sub-domains, UCF Control ID, ISF Standard 2007 [I34], CobiT [I27], ISO/IEC Guidelines for ICT and disaster recovery services [I12], ISO/IEC 27001 [I23], ISO/IEC 27002 [I24], ITIL Service Support [I15], ITIL Security Management [I15], IT Baseline Protection Manual.

>I have a requirement from client to assess their System >against the requirements of SOX and HIPPA. >I have some idea of SOX and HIPPA and I think most of the >requirements are covered in ISO 27001. >I wanted to know from you all professional whats different in >SOX and HIPPA from ISO 27001 and also if any one can provide >me some checklists for these it would be great. Hi Vikas, First off you clearly need to research SOX and HIPAA (not HIPPA!). Both set explicit security requirements which you would need to check. Regardless of whether you find checklists (and I'm pretty sure Google will help find some), you need to do your homework in order to appreciate whether the checklists are useful, accurate and comprehensive.

The ISO27k standards promote a general ISMS framework that helps secure the underlying general technical infrastructure and provides the overarching management system, but whether the ISMS adequately covers specific compliance obligations such as SOX, HIPAA etc. Is not guaranteed by ISO27k alone. The compliance section (s15) of ISOEC 27002 *should* encourage management to ensure that such obligations are met but it would be wise to check the details.

Kind regards, Gary Gary Hinson Passionately curious, curiously passionate Creative awareness materials ISO/IEC 27000 standards Security and governance consulting Please avoid printing this email unless absolutely necessary and RECYCLE used printouts. Every little bit helps save the planet.

Vikas Dhanker 23:11. Hi Vikas: You can get a great help by mapping other standard or regulation requirements to ISO 1. For SOX: SEC. Management Assessment of internal controls. (a) Rules required (1) state the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. *Map to Chapter 5, ISO 27001*. (2) contain an assessment, as of the end of the most recent fiscal year of the issuer, of the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures of the issuer for financial reporting.

For assessment: *Map to Chapter 6, ISO 27001*. For effectiveness: *Map to six areas (chapters) in ISO 27002 by working with General Controls from an internal control system (like from ones from COSO, Turnbull or ISA 315)*. For HIPAA: You can considerar 5 paragraphs: 164.308/310/312/314/316: *Map to 1 their requirements: access management, awareness and contingency plans for 164.308, etc.* You can get good help in NIST 800-66, but for details you will be derived to a long series of NIST 800 standards.

Even I prefer to keep it as a complementary document in order to keep coherence with *our* ISO 1, I like NIST 800-66 checklists. Vcredist_x64 2017 on this page. Regards, Carlos Ormella Meyer j spence 04:30.

Hi Vince, SOX IT General Controls are a bit tricky because they focus on IT Governance rather than Information Security. And due to different testing procedures ISO 27001 certifcates are rarely usable for SOX assurance (I have not seen an ISO 27001 Auditor taking samples yet). COBIT might be the best approach to implement SOX compliant IT General Controls. You will definitely want to have a look on 'COBIT for Assurance' from the COBIT bundle for first implementation. For optimization have a look at 'Aligning CobiT 4.1, ITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 27002 for Business Benefit'.

We usually take the process enviroment from ITIL, map relevant COBIT controls on it and merge ISO 27002 into them, where applicable. You can also try to align COBIT and ITIL with risk management like ISO 31000 or 27005 first (COBIT for risk is a great help). Risk management helps bridging SOX requirements and COBIT with other relevant ISO Standards that are used in many companies (like ISO 9001 or 14001). However I highly advise to understand business first. In many middle market companies you can easily setup SOX compliant IT General Controls with less than 50 controls. Hi Vince, SOX IT General Controls are a bit tricky because they focus on IT Governance rather than Information Security.

And due to different testing procedures ISO 27001 certifcates are rarely usable for SOX assurance (I have not seen an ISO 27001 Auditor taking samples yet). COBIT might be the best approach to implement SOX compliant IT General Controls. You will definitely want to have a look on 'COBIT for Assurance' from the COBIT bundle for first implementation. For optimization have a look at 'Aligning CobiT 4.1, ITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 27002 for Business Benefit'.

We usually take the process enviroment from ITIL, map relevant COBIT controls on it and merge ISO 27002 into them, where applicable. You can also try to align COBIT and ITIL with risk management like ISO 31000 or 27005 first (COBIT for risk is a great help). Risk management helps bridging SOX requirements and COBIT with other relevant ISO Standards that are used in many companies (like ISO 9001 or 14001). However I highly advise to understand business first. In many middle market companies you can easily setup SOX compliant IT General Controls with less than 50 controls. Hi Vince, SOX IT General Controls are a bit tricky because they focus on IT Governance rather than Information Security. And due to different testing procedures ISO 27001 certifcates are rarely usable for SOX assurance (I have not seen an ISO 27001 Auditor taking samples yet).

COBIT might be the best approach to implement SOX compliant IT General Controls. You will definitely want to have a look on 'COBIT for Assurance' from the COBIT bundle for first implementation. For optimization have a look at 'Aligning CobiT 4.1, ITIL V3 and ISO/IEC 27002 for Business Benefit'. We usually take the process enviroment from ITIL, map relevant COBIT controls on it and merge ISO 27002 into them, where applicable. You can also try to align COBIT and ITIL with risk management like ISO 31000 or 27005 first (COBIT for risk is a great help). Risk management helps bridging SOX requirements and COBIT with other relevant ISO Standards that are used in many companies (like ISO 9001 or 14001). However I highly advise to understand business first.

In many middle market companies you can easily setup SOX compliant IT General Controls with less than 50 controls.